My Car was Burglarized but There’s an Important Economic Lesson

What can be learned from this costly and disheartening situation?

A few days ago, my car window was smashed into a million pieces by some callous thief and broken into, leaving me frustrated and scared.

As I was getting out of work, I turn around the corner to see my driver’s window completely gone. My heart sank. Then I started to panic a little. What do I do now?

My first thought was, why me? There were more expensive cars parked next to mine like BMWs and Mercedes but why target my 2009 Cadillac SUV?

Even more confusing was the motive behind breaking into my car. I had no valuables in my car and the only thing worth taking is my aux cord or the penny and nickel laying about, but none of those were taken.

In fact, whoever did this took nothing but decided it was worth their time and risk getting caught to smash into an almost empty car. I barely have anything in my car for this reason so I don’t give criminals a reason to break-in.

Even though they still smashed my window, it’s still wise to take precaution and reduce your chances of becoming a statistic.

Here’s some advice: never leave your phone or other valuables (especially guns) in your car even if it’s in your glovebox, criminals can still force it open. And don’t give the impression that you might be hiding something underneath things like piles of clothes, keep your car clutter-free or hide it in the trunk. Also, park in well-lit areas with lots of people.

But how does this relate to economics?

The important lesson we can learn from my personal experience is a prime example of the broken window fallacy, a parable by French economist, Frédéric Bastiat.

Bastiat gives an example of a shopkeeper whose son breaks his window and now has to shell out a pretty penny for repairs. A bunch of spectators witness the shattered glass and defend the damage by claiming it keeps the window repairman in business.

Likewise, my car window was broken but the auto shop now has my business. At first glance, this seems beneficial like a silver lining and it does give the auto shop more money. But we must ask the question, at what cost and who’s paying for it?

Are broken windows a net gain to society?

Does destruction help or hinder society’s progress?

The answer seems like an obvious “No” but people still argue in favor of destruction since it creates jobs and helps the auto shop stay in business.

However, it was at my expense and the $200 that went towards the new window could’ve been used for my wants and needs. I needed that money for gas, food, and a new pair of shoes to replace my worn out ones. I also wanted a skincare set for my acne-ridden face, and I could’ve had all those things and an intact window but instead I’m left with just a window and nothing else.

Multiple businesses and local gas stations and I could’ve benefitted more compared to just the auto shop.

In the words of Bastiat, “destruction is not profit.”

Austrian Economics is Common Sense Observation

The Austrian school of economics derives most of it’s teachings from logic and philosophy. Austrians, students of this branch of economics, don’t create new rules, rather they observe and interpret the natural interactions in the market that were already there.

Think of it as Isaac Newton “discovering” the laws of gravity. He didn’t create those laws and then gravity suddenly behaved the way he described it, he’s simply concretizing natural phenomenons that already occurred. Continue reading Austrian Economics is Common Sense Observation

Five Below is One Reason Why I Love Capitalism

I feel like I’ve been living under a rock because I had no idea Five Below existed until this year. It’s the best place to shop for gifts within a cheap budget and everything is five dollars or under!

Think of it as a higher quality version of the dollar store with more variety. Continue reading Five Below is One Reason Why I Love Capitalism

Review of Month 4 of Praxis

I’ve successfully completed another month of Praxis and it’s been a positive learning experience.

To recap, month four is about consuming content and feeding my brain with philosophy, critical thinking, history, economics, and culture. Every week I watched lectures and read articles then uploaded a video about the content I learned.

Week one

The first week I read articles on critical thinking and the work required to have an opinion. Additionally, I learned something new; philosophers make great entrepreneurs and both have similar mindsets.

Week two

During week two, I dived into basic philosophy like how an actual argument is structured and logical fallacies to look out for.

I already knew most of the fallacies but the structure of arguments was new to me. One drawback during this week was the quality of the professor’s teaching in the videos. I would’ve liked to see the professor elaborate more on each concept. Additionally, it would’ve helped if he could give complex examples.

Week three

In week three I started to feel some resistance and impatience. There were a set of ten lectures from the Commerce and Culture podcast by Paul Cantor. Each lecture was and hour and forty minutes which took a long time to get through. Also, Cantor tends to say “um” a lot which makes it difficult to focus and rather annoying.

Overall, it was an excellent podcast packed with a history of Western culture. Cantor builds a case against Marxism by explaining how culture flourished with the free market.

Week four

This final week was a bit more challenging but enlightening. I wasn’t aware of the argument against intellectual property laws from a tech point of view. I read a series of articles called Breaking Smart which was more academic leaning in the way it was written, dense sentences with lots of technical terms and adjectives.

Additionally, I watched a short documentary series on how everything in culture is a remix. It’s a well done documentary that will keep you interested every minute.

Overall, I’d give this module an 7 out of ten with ten being the best rating. It’s especially more valuable for those who have no prior knowledge of philosophy or economics. But it could be better with shorter lectures since it felt like being in a boring, mind-numbing class again. Praxis could also add an Eastern view of philosophy and culture instead of just a Western one.

Government is Obstructing Innovation

Intellectual property (IP) laws are becoming obsolete. Blockchain has paved the way for a more voluntary society without the coercion of the government.

Blockchain technology like smart contracts are faster and cheaper ways of executing legal contracts. It’s also more trustworthy and it can prevent situations like a dishonest landlord who claimed you didn’t pay rent on time, and provide proof from thousands of other ledgers who confirmed a transaction.

Basically, if the conditions for a contract aren’t met then the code inside it would not execute the end result. Check out this beginner’s guide on how smart contracts work.

Pastoralism is Elitism

Pastoralism is a common form of elitist thinking. The term refers to nostalgia for the pristine “good old days” coupled with future technology to perpetuate a vision for all of society.

The problem with pastoralism is the one size fits all concept. It ignores each individual’s needs and forces them into a predetermined lifestyle.

The prime example of this is the white picket fence suburbia of the 1950s. It’s highly romanticized with cool futuristic technology like jetpacks and flying cars, merely updated for the ideal nuclear family.

What pastoralists don’t understand is that technology was meant to disrupt traditional lifestyles and usher in a new defining age like the one we live in today. Startups flourish by disrupting traditional office environments and it gave people more freedom to define their lives on their own terms. Compare it to the pastoralist’s view that the only path to success is earning a degree, owning a house, getting married, and having kids.

Pastoralism is elitist thinking because it sets back progress (both technological and moral) and demands everyone to live by their one cultural standard. The pastoralist views of the 1950s still affect us greatly today.

Modernist planners created the suburbs to center around the car and commute to work. The problem was it priced the poor out and separated people from economic centers and places with lots of jobs. Not everyone can afford a car.

You can read a longer explanation of pastoralism by Venkatesh Rao.

Original Ideas are Actually Copies of Originals

Everything is a Remix Part 4 from Kirby Ferguson on Vimeo.

This is one of the most engaging and well-edited documentary series I’ve watched. I highly recommend you to watch all four parts if you have an appreciation for culture.

Everything is a Remix explains how every work of art, music, inventions, or some other idea isn’t so original as one might think. Instead, creating culture begins by borrowing and building upon other people’s ideas over time. Culture is more of an evolution rather than a big bang.

“Copy, Transform, and Combine”

Hunter S. Thompson learned to write novels by copying Hemingway word for word until he figured out a formula and created his unique voice. Likewise, classically trained artists and musicians learn the styles of the old masters first before they could develop their own style.

If you wanted to have credibility in the fine arts world, you needed to demonstrate competency in basic still life, anatomy, figure drawings, and the color wheel. Just take a look at Pablo Picasso’s earlier works. As a musician, you needed to learn composers starting from the Baroque era, instead of learning just pop music.

Let ideas roam free without the restriction of intellectual property laws.